Re: [RFC][PATCH] linux-2.6.2-rc2_vsyscall-gtod_B1.patch

[Ulrich Drepper]

Ingo Molnar wrote:

> but i'm a bit worried about the apparent fact that adding 200 more
> symbols (and making the vDSO a real DSO in essence) to abstract the
> kernel syscalls is apparently unacceptable performance-wise. If this is
> true then the whole dynamic linking architecture is much slower than it
> should be, isnt it?

If the syscall entry code in the vdso takes care of the multiplexing we
do not have to add any symbols to the vdso's symbol table.  There are no
additional costs associated with adding more optimized syscalls other
than the multiplexer and that cost would be constant if a jump table is
used.

For now, the simple single cmpl is sufficient.

-- 
â Ulrich Drepper â Red Hat, Inc. â 444 Castro St â Mountain View, CA â
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/