Re: BitKeeper repo for KGDB

[Pavel Machek]

Hi!

> > > Hello everybody.  Since I've been talking with George off-list about
> > > trying to merge the various versions of KGDB around, and I just read the
> > > thread between Andy and Jim about conflicting on KGDB work, I've put up
> > > a BitKeeper repository[1] to try and coordinate things.
> > > 
> > > What's in there right now is Amit's kgdb 2.1.0, without the ethernet
> > > patch.   There's also all of the changes for PPC and for generic stuffs
> > > that I've been doing of late.
> > > 
> > > What I'll be doing shortly (this afternoon even) is to change from a
> > > struct of function pointers, for the arch specific functions, into a set
> > > of provided, weak, variants and then allow arches to override as needed.
> > > 
> > > What I'd like is for someone to move the ethernet bits from the -mm tree
> > > into here, and for people to merge the fixes / enhancements that're in
> > > their per-arch stubs in the -mm tree into the split design that Amit's
> > > version has.
> > > 
> > > Comments? Screams? Patches? :)
> > 
> > This one. It compiles. It needs -netpoll. It probably does not work.
> 
> Er, what's this against?  I don't have drivers/net/kgdb_eth.c in my repo
> right now (nor the -netpoll patch, but I'll happily take a patch to add
> the kgdb over enet stub and -netpoll).

It's against 2.6 + -netpoll + Amit's patch.
								Pavel
-- 
When do you have a heart between your knees?
[Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/