Re: [PATCH] psmouse info in 2.6.1-rc1

From: Marcos D. Marado Torres
Date: Mon Jan 05 2004 - 15:54:36 EST


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Hi there...

Somebody replied privatly to me about this patch, telling me to submit it
somewhere... But I mistakenly deleted it :-(

Could that person please send it to me again?

Thanks in advance,
Mind Booster Noori

- --
==================================================
Marcos Daniel Marado Torres AKA Mind Booster Noori
/"\ http://student.dei.uc.pt/~marado
\ / marado@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X ASCII Ribbon Campaign
/ \ against HTML e-mail and Micro$oft attachments
==================================================

On Mon, 5 Jan 2004, Marcos D. Marado Torres wrote:

> On Mon, 5 Jan 2004, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>
> > On Monday 05 January 2004 12:16 pm, Marcos D. Marado Torres wrote:
> > > Hi there...
> > > I don't really know if this is only in -rc1-mm1 but I suppose -rc1 is
> > > affected also.
> > >
> > > The new changes in drivers/input/mouse/psmouse-base.c make that we
> > > don't have anymore to give to kernel psmouse_proto=imps, but only
> > > proto=imps , so the info about it is wrong... Please apply the patch:
> > >
> > > --- linux-2.6.1-rc1-mm2/drivers/input/mouse/Kconfig 2004-01-05
> > > 10:51:16.000000000 +0100 +++
> > > linux-2.6.1-rc1-mm2-mbn1/drivers/input/mouse/Kconfig 2004-01-05
> > > 13:34:26.000000000 +0100 @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
> > > http://www.geocities.com/dt_or/gpm/gpm.html
> > > to take advantage of the advanced features of the touchpad.
> > > If you do not want install specialized drivers but want
> > > tapping - working please use option psmouse.proto=imps.
> > > + working please use option proto=imps.
> > >
> > > If unsure, say Y.
> >
> >
> > It is psmouse.proto=imps if psmouse is built in the kernel and proto=imps
> > if psmouse is compiled as a module. I mentioned only the first form because
> > I assumed that most people have it built-in.
>
> Weird: I have it built in the kernel and need to do proto=imps and not
> psmouse.proto=imps ...
>
> Anyway, wasn't the patch (one of) made so that users would have to pass to the
> kernel the same for both cases?
>
> > Generally with the module_param macros kernel parameters have a prefix
> > in form of "module_name." if module is built into the kernel.
> >
> > Dmitry
> >
>
>
> --
> ==================================================
> Marcos Daniel Marado Torres AKA Mind Booster Noori
> /"\ http://student.dei.uc.pt/~marado
> \ / marado@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> X ASCII Ribbon Campaign
> / \ against HTML e-mail and Micro$oft attachments
> ==================================================
>
>
> ------------ Output from gpg ------------
> gpg: WARNING: using insecure memory!
> gpg: please see http://www.gnupg.org/faq.html for more information
> gpg: Signature made Mon 05 Jan 2004 06:29:23 PM WET using DSA key ID 6FA80F7E
> gpg: Good signature from "Mind Booster Noori <marado@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>"
>
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76

iD8DBQE/+c6rmNlq8m+oD34RAo1nAJ0QgWIzTkX/LL/KO5gzL0dFsVh/oQCfbEpB
0iLrvtzbQtTfmiCXARnGP5I=
=URqq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/