Re: Pentium M config option for 2.6

[Mikael Pettersson]

On Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 13:33:58 +0100, Tomas Szepe wrote:
> > IOW, don't lie to the compiler and pretend P-M == P4
> > with that -march=pentium4.
> 
> What do you recommend to use as march then?  There is
> no pentiumm subarch support in gcc yet;  I was convinced
> p4 was the closest match.

march=pentium3 is the closest safe choice, at least
until gcc implements P-M specific support.

/Mikael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/