Re: inode_cache / dentry_cache not being reclaimed aggressively enough on low-memory PCs

From: John Lash
Date: Sun Jan 04 2004 - 00:34:19 EST


ahh, good. I'll take a look. Thanks Andrew.

--john


On Sat, 3 Jan 2004 14:55:57 -0800
Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> John Lash <jlash@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > As it stands, it will maintain as many unused entries as there are used
> > entries.
> > If this low memory system las a large, stable, number of inuse dentry
> > objects, the unused entries will match it thereby holding double the memory
> > and possibly causing the problem you see.
>
> Yup. There is a fix in 2.6.1-rc1 for this.
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/