Re: 2.6.0-test6: APM unable to suspend (the 2.6.0-test2 sagacontinues)

[Rusty Russell]

On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 13:40:33 +0100
Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > +#undef MODULE_PARAM_PREFIX
> > +#define MODULE_PARAM_PREFIX /* empty */
> > +
> >  static unsigned int i8042_noaux;
> >  module_param(i8042_noaux, bool, 0);
> 
> Well, I think it might be cleaner to just drop the i8042_ prefix and go
> with the "i8042." prefix if that's the 2.6 way. It'll annoy a couple
> people, but's it's the way to go in the future.

Yeah, unless there's a good reason, it's nicer if there's symmetry so
people can guess how to pass params.

Thanks,
Rusty.
-- 
   there are those who do and those who hang on and you don't see too
   many doers quoting their contemporaries.  -- Larry McVoy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/