Re: ext2 on a CD-RW

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Thu Jan 01 2004 - 19:25:01 EST


Peter Osterlund <petero2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> If I create an ext2 filesystem
> with 2kb blocksize, I hit a bug when I try to write some large files to
> the filesystem. The problem is that the code in mpage_writepage() fails if
> a page is mapped to disk across a packet boundary. In that case, the
> bio_add_page() call at line 543 in mpage.c can fail even if the bio was
> previously empty. The code then passes an empty bio to submit_bio(), which
> triggers a bug at line 2303 in ll_rw_blk.c. This patch seems to fix the
> problem.
>
> --- linux/fs/mpage.c.old 2004-01-02 00:26:19.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux/fs/mpage.c 2004-01-02 00:26:50.000000000 +0100
> @@ -541,6 +541,11 @@
>
> length = first_unmapped << blkbits;
> if (bio_add_page(bio, page, length, 0) < length) {
> + if (!bio->bi_size) {
> + bio_put(bio);
> + bio = NULL;
> + goto confused;
> + }
> bio = mpage_bio_submit(WRITE, bio);
> goto alloc_new;
> }

Confused. We initially have an empty BIO, and we run bio_add_page()
against it, adding one page.

How can that bio_add_page() fail to add the page?

Cold you describe the failure a little more please?

> I noted that performance is quite bad with 2kb blocksize. It is a lot
> faster with 4kb blocksize. (2kb blocksize with the udf filesystem is not
> slow, only ext2 seems to have this problem.) Maybe the "confused" case
> (which calls a_ops->writepage()) in mpage_writepage() isn't really meant
> to be fast. Is there a better way to fix this problem?

How much slower is it?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/