Re: 2.6.0-test6: APM unable to suspend (the 2.6.0-test2 saga continues)

[Linus Torvalds]

On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, Russell King wrote:
> 
> - i8042_noaux=1 - this doesn't seem to make any difference, although
>   this does appear to leave the CTR set as 0x65, which appears to be
>   the BIOS-set value.

Doesn't that leave the kbd mask the same? In particular, it still sets the 
"disable" bit, aka I8042_CTR_KBDDIS later on..

What happens if you just define I8042_CTR_KBDDIS to zero?

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/