Re: Page aging broken in 2.6

From: Rik van Riel
Date: Fri Dec 26 2003 - 22:37:06 EST


On Fri, 26 Dec 2003, Andrew Morton wrote:

> The current behaviour seems better from a theoretical point of view.

It's certainly easier to understand when tuning the VM,
indeed.

> And if we want to give mapped pages more preference over unmapped ones
> (they already have some preference, by the default value of
> /proc/sys/vm/swappiness), we have less radical ways of doing this.

Agreed, the current swappiness is probably a better measure.
More flexible and more easy to tune.

cheers,

Rik
--
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/