Re: Page aging broken in 2.6

From: Rik van Riel
Date: Fri Dec 26 2003 - 21:49:09 EST


On Fri, 26 Dec 2003, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> I'll let Rik and Andrea argue that part - it's entirely possible that
> getting lots of positive results is a _good_ thing, if the same page is
> mapped multiple times. That would just make us less eager to unmap it,
> which sounds like potentially the right thign to do (it's also how the
> old non-rmap code worked, and I know Rik thought it was "unfair", but
> whatever).

I'm really not sure which of the two behaviours would
perform better. Chances are both behaviours will show
some performance improvement over the other, depending
on the workload...

Rik
--
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/