Re: Linux GPL and binary module exception clause?

[Peter Chubb]

>>>>> "Nick" == Nick Piggin <piggin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

Nick> Paul Adams wrote:


Nick> Seriously: What about specifically a module that includes the
Nick> Linux Kernel's headers and uses its APIs? I don't think you
Nick> could say that is definitely not a derivative work.

As far as I know, interfacing to a published API doesn't infringe
copyright.

Note:


Paul>   A standard filter is that you eliminate an element if "The
Paul> element's expression was dictated by external factors, such as
Paul> using an existing file format or interoperating with another
Paul> program."  Computer Associates v. Altai specifically discusses
Paul> the need to filter elements related to "compatibility
Paul> requirements of other programs with which a program is designed
Paul> to operate in conjunction." 
Paul> http://www.bitlaw.com/source/cases/copyright/altai.html


If you don't accept this, then maybe you have to start accepting SCO's
claims on JFS, XFS, &c.

(Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer)
--
Dr Peter Chubb  http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au  peterc AT gelato.unsw.edu.au
The technical we do immediately,  the political takes *forever*
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/