Re: [CFT] 2.6.x experimental net driver updates

[viro]

On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 12:23:44AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 12:33:08PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >
> >>Ok, Al Viro's net driver refcounting work is pretty much complete, and 
> >
> >
> >The hell it is.  We are through with legacy probes, we are through with
> >init_etherdev(), we are practically through with static struct net_device.
> 
> hehe :)  I don't mean to suggest that all is clean and pure :)
> 
> 
> >However, we still have weird allocators (I've got almost all of them
> >done by now, will submit in the next batch) and we still have struct
> >net_device embedded as a field of other structures in several drivers.
> 
> Some of that will be interesting.  ns83820 for example embedded 
> net_device on purpose...  Ben seemed to think at the time it gave him 
> some speed, a few less pointer derefs and such.

That's fine, but 83820 should be doing that the other way round.

Note that for objects allocated by alloc_netdev() we have
	(char*) dev->priv == (char *)dev + const
and constant can be found at compile time _if_ we pad in front of
net_device and add a pointer to allocated block into net_device.

So we can have exactly the same structure (modulo padding) and no extra
dereferencing.  All we need is inlined void *net_priv(struct net_device *);

That, BTW, would be a win for other drivers using alloc_...() and not
reassigning ->priv (i.e. majority of those beasts).
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/