Re: [PATCH] cfq + io priorities

[Pavel Machek]

Hi!

> I suppose the nice() wrapper in glibc could
> be modified... but that's kind of silly when
> the kernel is getting modified anyway.

Perhaps modifying glibc is the right way after all. We do not want to
have nice(), ionice() and then cpunice() as a kernel interface.

OTOH it would be good to keep ionice() on the same scale as other
"nice" values so that "do-it-all" interface is easier.

								Pavel
-- 
When do you have a heart between your knees?
[Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/