Re: why no Kconfig in "kernel" subdir?

From: Randy.Dunlap
Date: Fri Nov 14 2003 - 17:14:11 EST


On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 16:34:26 -0500 Chris Friesen <cfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

| Randy.Dunlap wrote:
|
|
| > I consider PREEMPT and SMP arch-specific, not generic.
|
| Interesting. Might I ask why? I thought that most of PREEMPT was
| pretty arch-neutral.

Right, most of it is arch-neutral.
It appears that PA-RISC doesn't support PREEMPT:

include/asm-parisc/hardirq.h:
#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
# error CONFIG_PREEMT currently not supported.
[complete with typo]

and UML doesn't support PREEMPT either.


| > Will init/Kconfig do what you want?
|
| As long as there is some place to put generic options that are
| applicable to the system as a whole, then I'm happy.

I expect that it's workable.

--
~Randy
MOTD: Always include version info.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/