Re: OT: why no file copy() libc/syscall ??

From: H. Peter Anvin
Date: Thu Nov 13 2003 - 15:25:35 EST


Followup to: <20031111085323.M8854@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
By author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@xxxxxxxxxx>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
> >
> > Actually, I think we should have a:
> >
> > long copy_fd_to_fd (int src, int dst, int len)
> >
> > type of systemcall.
>
> We have one, sendfile(2).
>

It would be very nice if we could (a) expand the uses of sendfile(2),
and (b) have the libc do the fallback to read/write/mmap as needed.

-hpa

--
<hpa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> at work, <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> in private!
If you send me mail in HTML format I will assume it's spam.
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
Architectures needed: ia64 m68k mips64 ppc ppc64 s390 s390x sh v850 x86-64
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/