Re: [PATCH?] 2.6.0-test9: mm/memory.c:1075: spin_unlock(kernel/fork.c:c0efed90)not locked

From: Linus Torvalds
Date: Tue Nov 11 2003 - 11:13:34 EST



On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
>
> As far as I can tell, problem is that no_mem case should NOT release page_table_lock
> as it was already released before call to pte_chain_alloc(), and was not reacquired
> yet.

Your patch looks correct to me..

Linus

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/