Re: kernel.bkbits.net off the air

[Timothy Miller]

Please pardon my late intrusion into this discussion of what appears to 
be CVS mirror coherency.  The impression I get, which may be wrong, is 
that one or both of these problems is happening:

- A user is pulling from one CVS mirror, but that mirror is in the 
process of being updated from the BK source, so the user gets some new 
files and some old ones.

- A user is pulling from more than one CVS mirror at the same time, and 
not all mirrors are at the same revision level.


Either way, and I would not be surprised if someone else had suggested 
this already, but being a graphics person, let me suggest a common 
technique for dealing with this problem:  double-buffering.


Let's assume a combination of the two above cases, because the general 
solution applies to all cases.

To begin with, all mirrors serve from the "front buffer", all of which 
are known to be at the same revision level for all files.  While serving 
the front buffers, the "back buffers" are being updated.

At a prescribed time, all servers go off-line (to deal with 
asynchronicity between clocks), swap the front and back buffers, and 
then go back online.

The synchronization problem can be dealt with either by having everyone 
have their clocks set relatively close but go offline for a few seconds 
just in case there is some drift, or there can be a master server which 
signals the others when to swap buffers.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/