Re: [PATCH] Fix find busiest queue 2.6.0-test9

From: Martin J. Bligh
Date: Sun Nov 09 2003 - 10:59:27 EST


>> I ran it on the 16-way - no difference in performance. If the code is
>> correct as was before (and I agree, it seems it was), perhaps it's just
>> in need of a big fat comment to explain the confusion? ;-)
>
> Ingo already dropped a fat comment ;) This is the relevant part:
>
> * We fend off statistical fluctuations in runqueue lengths by
> * saving the runqueue length during the previous load-balancing
> * operation and using the smaller one the current and saved lengths.

I think the confusing bit is this:

this_rq->prev_cpu_load[i] = rq_src->nr_running;

where "this_rq->prev_cpu_load[i]" doesn't intuitively look like what it
means ;-) Even just 's/i/cpu/' would help a bit, or something (like
wrapping it in macros). Seems it is correct as was though - thanks for
explaining it.

M.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/