Re: ReiserFS patch for updating ctimes of renamed files

From: Hans Reiser
Date: Tue Oct 14 2003 - 01:31:56 EST


Andrew Morton wrote:

Hans Reiser <reiser@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


do you think schultz's arguments about why it is wrong are correct? They seem well thought out to me.



Well given that you've renamed the file, you do want the backup program to
pick up the "new" file. But it'd be a pretty lame backup program which was
fooled by a missing ctime update.

Yes, John has a point but we're not going to go and change all the other
filesystems (are we?).





why not? It is correct therefor....

--
Hans


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/