Re: patches for PROC_FS=n (2.6.0-test7)

From: David S. Miller
Date: Sat Oct 11 2003 - 14:47:03 EST


On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 21:40:08 +0200
Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Due to this - the real offender:
>
> from: net/atm/clip.c:
> #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
> #include <linux/proc_fs.h>
> #include <linux/seq_file.h>
> #endif

That makes a whole lot more sense, here is the fix I just
checked in:

# This is a BitKeeper generated patch for the following project:
# Project Name: Linux kernel tree
# This patch format is intended for GNU patch command version 2.5 or higher.
# This patch includes the following deltas:
# ChangeSet 1.1352 -> 1.1353
# net/atm/clip.c 1.26 -> 1.27
#
# The following is the BitKeeper ChangeSet Log
# --------------------------------------------
# 03/10/11 davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 1.1353
# [ATM]: Kill PROC_FS ifdef around includes.
# --------------------------------------------
#
diff -Nru a/net/atm/clip.c b/net/atm/clip.c
--- a/net/atm/clip.c Sat Oct 11 12:43:12 2003
+++ b/net/atm/clip.c Sat Oct 11 12:43:12 2003
@@ -24,10 +24,8 @@
#include <linux/if.h> /* for IFF_UP */
#include <linux/inetdevice.h>
#include <linux/bitops.h>
-#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
#include <linux/proc_fs.h>
#include <linux/seq_file.h>
-#endif
#include <net/route.h> /* for struct rtable and routing */
#include <net/icmp.h> /* icmp_send */
#include <asm/param.h> /* for HZ */
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/