Re: [Fastboot] kexec update (2.6.0-test7)

[bill davidsen]

In article <m1y8vufe5l.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
| Cherry George Mathew <cherry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
| 
| > On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
| > 
| > > You'll need to update the kexec-syscall.c file for the correct
| > > kexec syscall number (274).
| > 
| > Is there a consensus about what the syscall number will finally be ? We've
| > jumped from 256 to 274 over the 2.5.x+  series kernels. Or is it the law
| > the Jungle ?
| 
| So far the law of the jungle.  Regardless of the rest it looks like it
| is time to submit a place keeping patch.

Forgive me if the politics of this have changed, but will a place
keeping patch be accepted for a feature which has not? 
-- 
bill davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
  CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/