Re: [PATCH] Poll-based IDE driver

[Dave Jones]

On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 03:13:57PM +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:

 > /* Wait for at least N usecs (1 clock per cycle, 10GHz processor = 10000) */
 > /* ToDo : replace this routine based on loops_per_jiffy?? */
 > static inline void dump_udelay(unsigned int num_usec)
 > {
 > 	volatile unsigned int i;
 > 	for (i = 0; i < 10000 * num_usec; i++);
 > }

Why not just use udelay() ?  The above code cannot possibly do
the right thing on all processors.

		Dave

-- 
 Dave Jones     http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/