RE: [PATCH] incorrect use of sizeof() in ioctl definitions

[Tian, Kevin]

Well, I may misunderstand the measurement here. By previous comment from
Matthew Wilcox, I see "Clearly it's too late to change the ioctl
definitions...". Er, so all things like IOR_BAD and size_t are just to
keep current API untouched, while warning subsequent guys right way to
populate ioctls. :) Then the last question is: is it worthy of some
efforts to modify these APIs completely? Maybe the bee just bites
once...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/