Re: [PATCH] incorrect use of sizeof() in ioctl definitions

[Matthew Wilcox]

On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 02:08:05PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Arun Sharma <arun.sharma@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Some drivers seem to use macros such as _IOR/_IOW in a way that ends up calling the sizeof() operator twice. For eg:
> > 
> > -#define FBIO_ATY128_GET_MIRROR	_IOR('@', 1, sizeof(__u32*))
> > +#define FBIO_ATY128_GET_MIRROR	_IOR('@', 1, __u32*)

The real problem is that ia64 doesn't have the typechecking ioctl
definitions yet.  Here's what I committed for parisc recently (it applies
to ia64 too):

+++ include/asm-parisc/ioctl.h  21 Sep 2003 01:01:38 -0000      1.2
@@ -44,11 +44,21 @@
         ((nr)   << _IOC_NRSHIFT) | \
         ((size) << _IOC_SIZESHIFT))
 
+/* provoke compile error for invalid uses of size argument */
+extern int __invalid_size_argument_for_IOC;
+#define _IOC_TYPECHECK(t) \
+       ((sizeof(t) == sizeof(t[1]) && \
+         sizeof(t) < (1 << _IOC_SIZEBITS)) ? \
+         sizeof(t) : __invalid_size_argument_for_IOC)
+
 /* used to create numbers */
 #define _IO(type,nr)           _IOC(_IOC_NONE,(type),(nr),0)
-#define _IOR(type,nr,size)     _IOC(_IOC_READ,(type),(nr),sizeof(size))
-#define _IOW(type,nr,size)     _IOC(_IOC_WRITE,(type),(nr),sizeof(size))
-#define _IOWR(type,nr,size)    _IOC(_IOC_READ|_IOC_WRITE,(type),(nr),sizeof(siz
e))
+#define _IOR(type,nr,size)     _IOC(_IOC_READ,(type),(nr),(_IOC_TYPECHECK(size)
))
+#define _IOW(type,nr,size)     _IOC(_IOC_WRITE,(type),(nr),(_IOC_TYPECHECK(size
)))
+#define _IOWR(type,nr,size)    _IOC(_IOC_READ|_IOC_WRITE,(type),(nr),(_IOC_TYPE
CHECK(size)))
+#define _IOR_BAD(type,nr,size) _IOC(_IOC_READ,(type),(nr),sizeof(size))
+#define _IOW_BAD(type,nr,size) _IOC(_IOC_WRITE,(type),(nr),sizeof(size))
+#define _IOWR_BAD(type,nr,size)        _IOC(_IOC_READ|_IOC_WRITE,(type),(nr),si
zeof(size))
 
 /* used to decode ioctl numbers.. */
 #define _IOC_DIR(nr)           (((nr) >> _IOC_DIRSHIFT) & _IOC_DIRMASK)

> Matthew Wilcox fixed all except one of these a while back.  What is left
> over is this chunk:
> 
> 
> diff -puN drivers/video/aty/aty128fb.c~sizeof-in-ioctl-fix drivers/video/aty/aty128fb.c
> --- 25/drivers/video/aty/aty128fb.c~sizeof-in-ioctl-fix	Tue Sep 30 14:04:12 2003
> +++ 25-akpm/drivers/video/aty/aty128fb.c	Tue Sep 30 14:04:12 2003
> @@ -2041,9 +2041,9 @@ aty128fb_setcolreg(u_int regno, u_int re
>  #define ATY_MIRROR_CRT_ON	0x00000002
>  
>  /* out param: u32*	backlight value: 0 to 15 */
> -#define FBIO_ATY128_GET_MIRROR	_IOR('@', 1, sizeof(__u32*))
> +#define FBIO_ATY128_GET_MIRROR	_IOR('@', 1, __u32*)
>  /* in param: u32*	backlight value: 0 to 15 */
> -#define FBIO_ATY128_SET_MIRROR	_IOW('@', 2, sizeof(__u32*))
> +#define FBIO_ATY128_SET_MIRROR	_IOW('@', 2, __u32*)
>  
>  static int aty128fb_ioctl(struct inode *inode, struct file *file, u_int cmd,
>  			  u_long arg, struct fb_info *info)
> 
> 
> Matthew's conversion mainly converted things to size_t, but from the looks
> of it, __u32* is the right thing to use in this case, I think?

I think so, given:

radeonfb.h:#define FBIO_RADEON_GET_MIRROR       _IOR('@', 3, size_t)
radeonfb.h:#define FBIO_RADEON_SET_MIRROR       _IOW('@', 4, size_t)

Though we can also change it to _IOR_BAD and _IOW_BAD.

-- 
"It's not Hollywood.  War is real, war is primarily not about defeat or
victory, it is about death.  I've seen thousands and thousands of dead bodies.
Do you think I want to have an academic debate on this subject?" -- Robert Fisk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/