Re: pm: Revert swsusp to 2.6.0-test3

[Nigel Cunningham]

Could you also give me some clear direction on where you want me to put
my 2.4 port. Should it go in kernel/power, or somewhere else? (I'm
assuming you don't want 3 versions of swsusp?!). I'd like to put it in
the right place when I start populating swsusp25.bkbits.net, so you're
not pulling changesets later that only move the code around (I know bk
reduces the cost, but...).

Regards,

Nigel

On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 05:40, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On 28 Sep 2003 pavel@xxxxxx wrote:
> > 
> > This should not be warring patch. Pat
> > already has variant in his tree,
> > feel free to pull from him - but it
> > would be nice to have working swsusp
> > in -test6. --p
> 
> Ok. In that case, can we remove the '#if 0' blocks entirely, or at least 
> add a big comment on why they are there but disabled?
> 
> I'd also like to have some kind of readme or similar on the different 
> suspend/resume issues, and why we have two different approaches. Hmm?
> 
> 		Linus
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-- 
Nigel Cunningham
495 St Georges Road South, Hastings 4201, New Zealand

You see, at just the right time, when we were still powerless,
Christ died for the ungodly.
	-- Romans 5:6, NIV.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/