Re: [PATCH] must fix list

[Nick Piggin]

Andrew Morton wrote:

> Nick Piggin <piggin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > I don't know what happened to this, but I thought it was quite good.
> > Maybe I missed something?
>
> It just didn't seem very relevant: people weren't keeping me up to date and
> a lot of the patches which were going in weren't related to anything on the
> lists.

I liked it. I think it gives you a good idea of the bigger changes
that need to happen and who is doing what. It might be a good idea to
keep around when you want to impose some sort of code freeze.

> > Anyway I have removed AS from the list because it is done. I removed CFQ
> > as well because when the schedulers become runtime selectable (sometime
> > I hope), merging it becomes a non issue, even during the stable series I
> > think.
> >
> > I updated the kernel/sched.c section a bit.
> >
> > I moved 64-bit dev_t from should fix to must fix.
> >
> > It looks like quite a bit can be struck off, but I'll leave it up to those
> > who actually did the work.
>
> Thanks.  Just for you, I'll do an update.

Hows it going?

> > Maybe these should go in Documentation/must-fix/ to make patching and
> > syncing easier?
>
> maybe...

IMO it would help

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/