Re: log-buf-len dynamic

From: Andrea Arcangeli
Date: Tue Sep 23 2003 - 21:40:01 EST


On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 07:29:48PM -0700, Larry McVoy wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 04:04:09AM +0200, andrea@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > What we expected in return was the same understanding.
> >
> > that is not accurate, you also asked us to giveup the freedom of
> > development in your area.
>
> If you were actually doing some significant development then maybe I'd
> respect you. But you aren't. So I don't. You don't have the slightest
> understanding in this area, you've proved that beyond all reasonable
> doubt. So you are just complaining about something you don't understand.
>
> I truly hope you follow in the footsteps of others who got pissed at the
> BK licensing and try to implement a replacement. BK makes VM systems
> seem like child's play. Centralized systems like CVS are child's play.

If you weren't using the linux VM I'd respect you, but you are, and
still I respected you so far, probably I was wrong.

Andrea - If you prefer relying on open source software, check these links:
rsync.kernel.org::pub/scm/linux/kernel/bkcvs/linux-2.[45]/
http://www.cobite.com/cvsps/
svn://svn.kernel.org/linux-2.[46]/trunk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/