CLONE_SIGHAND w/o CLONE_VM

From: Albert Cahalan
Date: Sun Sep 21 2003 - 22:09:04 EST


Does CLONE_SIGHAND without CLONE_VM ever
make sense?

Note that the arch-specific kernel_thread()
implementations add CLONE_VM, so kernel_thread()
usage doesn't count unless you can point to an
arch that doesn't add the CLONE_VM flag. (BTW, the
user-mode port is missing CLONE_UNTRACED. Bug?)


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/