Re: 2.6.0-test5 vs. Japanese keyboards [3]

From: Andries Brouwer
Date: Wed Sep 17 2003 - 12:26:30 EST


On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 09:35:22PM +0900, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
> Andries Brouwer <aebr@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > > > OGAWA Hirofumi posted a patch for the yen-sign pipe key on 2003.07.23
> > > > for test1 but his patch still didn't get into test3.

> > until 2.4 the value of NR_KEYS was 128, while 2.6 uses 256

> in input.h
> #define KEY_MAX 0x1ff
> in keyboard.h
> #define NR_KEYS (KEY_MAX+1)
>
> NR_KEYS is 512... Or we should use 256, you mean?

Yes, I think so.

Maybe Vojtech can tell us why he wrote 512, but I just see a
large amount of wasted space (and, as you already pointed out,
the need for new ioctls) if one uses 512.

As far as I can see, everything works with 256.
Indeed, everything seems to assume 256.

Andries

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/