Re: [PATCH] must fix list

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Wed Sep 17 2003 - 01:47:49 EST


Nick Piggin <piggin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I don't know what happened to this, but I thought it was quite good.
> Maybe I missed something?

It just didn't seem very relevant: people weren't keeping me up to date and
a lot of the patches which were going in weren't related to anything on the
lists.

> Anyway I have removed AS from the list because it is done. I removed CFQ
> as well because when the schedulers become runtime selectable (sometime
> I hope), merging it becomes a non issue, even during the stable series I
> think.
>
> I updated the kernel/sched.c section a bit.
>
> I moved 64-bit dev_t from should fix to must fix.
>
> It looks like quite a bit can be struck off, but I'll leave it up to those
> who actually did the work.

Thanks. Just for you, I'll do an update.

> Maybe these should go in Documentation/must-fix/ to make patching and
> syncing easier?

maybe...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/