Re: Incremental update of TCP Checksum

[Jesper Juhl]

On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Lincoln Dale wrote:

> At 06:35 AM 17/09/2003, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> >Personally I can't see that you have any other option. The way the
> >checksum is calculated information is lost, so it's impossible to
> >determine exactely what input generated the current output (the checksum).
> >Just as it is impossible to tell if the number 6 was generated from 2+2+2,
> >from 3*2 or from 3+3 or some other...  So I don't see what else you can do
> >except just recalculate the checksum from scratch. To try and determine
> >how your modification would affect the checksum would probably take far
> >longer than just re-calculating it.
>
> of course you can do an incremental checksum update.
> you know that if you're changing a field from (say) 0x22 to 0x11 then you
> can 'back out' the 0x22 and recalculate the checksum with 0x11.
>
> this is the whole rationale behind why its a _checksum_ and not a _CRC_.
>
> router(s) have taken advantage of incremental since day one.
>

I stand corrected.  Thank you for pointing that out.

Jesper Juhl <jju@xxxxxx>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/