Re: [PATCH] 2.6 workaround for Athlon/Opteron prefetch errata

[Bill Davidsen]

On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Dave Jones wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 12:46:36PM +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> 
>  > > The user space problem worries me more, because the expectation
>  > > is that if CPUID says the program can use perfetch, it could
>  > > and should regardless of what the kernel decided to do here.
>  > 
>  > If the workaround isn't compiled in, "prefetch" should be removed from
>  > /proc/cpuinfo on the buggy chips.
> 
> prefetch isn't a cpuid feature flag. The only way you could do
> what you suggest is by removing '3dnow' or 'sse', which cripples
> things more than necessary.

Good point, and even if it were a separate feature, any code which was
clever enough to use prefetch is likely to check the CPU bits rather
than the /proc anyway. That's a guess, I suspect most programs do
whatever gcc/glibc choose.

If the fixup were not in place, would it be useful to emit a warning
like "you have booted a non-Athlon kernel on an Athlon process, user
programs may get unexpected page faults." That's in init code, hopefully
there is no critical size issue there, I assume, other than how large a
kernel can be booted by the boot loader.

-- 
bill davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
  CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/