Re: Use of AI for process scheduling

[Timothy Miller]

Mike Fedyk wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 03:57:49PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 03:28:35PM -0400, Timothy Miller wrote:
> >
> > > Ok, I know I'm going too far.  Right now, the best application would be 
> > > the process scheduler, but we should start thinking about ways of making 
> > > the system "self aware" and "self correcting" so that when the model 
> > > observes the logic to misbehave, detailed information can be produced 
> > > for debugging purposes.
> > > Naturally, I am interested in contributing to this, but some of what I 
> > > will have to learn to participate will come out of ensuing discussions. 
> > > I have a lot to learn, but I think if these ideas are valuable, others 
> > > who already know enough will start to do something with them.
> >
> > Show me the code.
>
>
> I think he's working on a draft, not implementation.

Yeah, I didn't think his comment was very helpful since I thought it was 
clear that I was working on a draft of an IDEA.

> Any chance we'll see any code from you (or the group you seem to be trying
> to build) Tim?

Well...

Since I don't know enough about the actual kernel, I thought perhaps I 
could start with writing a generic neural net that could be added to the 
kernel.  The fact that I need an integer-only algorithm will require 
that I largely start from scratch.

I also need to refresh my memory on how to do back-propogation.

Oh, and most importantly, I need ideas from others so I don't go down 
the wrong path.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/