Re: [CFT][PATCH] new scheduler policy
From: Haoqiang Zheng
Date: Mon Sep 08 2003 - 09:21:15 EST
How do you define "priority inversion" if the app is remote?
Alan Cox wrote:
On Maw, 2003-09-02 at 15:25, Pavel Machek wrote:
in the best position to decide which process is more important.
That's why I proposed kernel based approach.
Tasks can easily report their interactivity needs/nice value.
X are already depend on clients not trying to screw each other,
so thats okay.
There is a slight problem with a kernel based approach too - the app may
be remote.
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/