[COMPLETELY OFF-TOPIC] Re: bandwidth for bkbits.net (good news)

From: Henning Schmiedehausen
Date: Mon Sep 08 2003 - 03:59:09 EST


That is where the thread started. ;-) As we reached the max kpps on a
C37xx point of discussion, we were already on 100 MBit Ethernet. ;-)

Let's end this thread.

Regards
Henning


On Sun, 2003-09-07 at 20:41, Ricky Beam wrote:
> On 7 Sep 2003, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
> >> 64B is the minimum ETHERNET frame size. That isn't true for PPP, HDLC,
> >> Frame relay, ATM, etc.
> >
> >We were talking 100 MBit Ethernet, weren't we? ;-)
>
> Actually, we're talking about VoIP between remote offices. We already
> know this is not accomplished via fast ethernet WAN links. The WAN
> link is, in fact, a T1. T1's do not have minimum frame sizes like
> ethernet.
>
> --Ricky
--
Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen INTERMETA GmbH
hps@xxxxxxxxxxxx +49 9131 50 654 0 http://www.intermeta.de/

Java, perl, Solaris, Linux, xSP Consulting, Web Services
freelance consultant -- Jakarta Turbine Development -- hero for hire

"Dominate!! Dominate!! Eat your young and aggregate! I have grotty silicon!"
-- AOL CD when played backwards (User Friendly - 200-10-15)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/