Re: [PATCH] fix remap of shared read only mappings

[Daniel Phillips]

On Friday 05 September 2003 00:33, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 17:48, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> However, POSIX does imply levels of cache coherence for both MAP_SHARED
> and MAP_PRIVATE:
>
> With MAP_SHARED, any change to the underlying object after the mapping
> must become visible to the mapper (although the change may be delayed by
> local caching of the changer's implementation until it is explicitly
> flushed).

This an interesting tidbit, as I'm busy working on a DFS mmap for OpenGFS, and 
I want to be sure I'm implementing true-blue Posix semantics.  But trawling 
through the Posix/SUS specification at:

   http://www.unix-systems.org/version3/online.html

all it says is that for MAP_SHARED "write references shall change the 
underlying object."  I don't see anything about when those changes become 
visible to other mappers, much less any discussion of local caching.  Am I 
looking at the wrong document?

Regards,

Daniel


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/