Re: Scaling noise

[Jörn Engel]

On Wed, 3 September 2003 08:10:33 -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> 
> > multi node yes, numa not much and where numa-like systems are being used
> > they are being used for message passing not as a fake big pc. 
> > 
> > Numa is valuable because
> > - It makes some things go faster without having to rewrite them
> > - It lets you partition a large box into several effective small ones 
> >   cutting maintenance
> > - It lets you partition a large box into several effective small ones
> >   so you can avoid buying two software licenses for expensive toys
> > 
> > if you actually care enough about performance to write the code to do
> > the job then its value is rather questionable. There are exceptions as
> > with anything else.
> 
> The real core use of NUMA is to run one really big app on one machine, 
> where it's hard to split it across a cluster. You just can't build an 
> SMP box big enough for some of these things.

This "hard to split" is usually caused by memory use instead of cpu
use, right?

I don't see a big problem scaling number crunchers over a cluster, but
a process with a working set >64GB cannot be split between 4GB
machines easily.

Jörn

-- 
Good warriors cause others to come to them and do not go to others.
-- Sun Tzu
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/