Re: 2.4.22aa1

[Marc-Christian Petersen]

On Tuesday 02 September 2003 04:02, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:

Hi Andrea,

> Only in 2.4.22aa1: 20_sched-o1-fixes-10
> Only in 2.4.22pre7aa1: 20_sched-o1-fixes-9
> 	Changed the CHILD_PENALTY logic to be centered around
> 	50%. From Kurt Garloff.

the changes 's/CHILD_PENALTY/CHILD_INHERITANCE' and "s/PARENT_PENALTIY//' are 
really awfull for desktops. If I change child_inheritance from 60 to 95 and 
reintroduce the logic with parent_penaltiy, it's alot smooter under load.

I think these logics should be #ifdef'ed with CONFIG_DESKTOP, no?

ciao, Marc

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Tuesday 02 September 2003 04:02, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:

Hi Andrea,

> Only in 2.4.22aa1: 20_sched-o1-fixes-10
> Only in 2.4.22pre7aa1: 20_sched-o1-fixes-9
> 	Changed the CHILD_PENALTY logic to be centered around
> 	50%. From Kurt Garloff.

the changes 's/CHILD_PENALTY/CHILD_INHERITANCE' and "s/PARENT_PENALTIY//' are 
really awfull for desktops. If I change child_inheritance from 60 to 95 and 
reintroduce the logic with parent_penaltiy, it's alot smooter under load.

I think these logics should be #ifdef'ed with CONFIG_DESKTOP, no?

ciao, Marc

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/