Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.6.0-test4-mm4 with contest

[Mike Fedyk]

On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 04:27:28PM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
> contest benchmarks.
> 
> no_load:
> Kernel          [runs]  Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
> 2.6.0-test4          1  80      93.8    0.0     0.0     1.00
> 2.6.0-test4-mm2      1  79      93.7    0.0     0.0     1.00
> 2.6.0-test4-mm4      1  80      93.8    0.0     0.0     1.00

Regressions:
> cacherun:
> Kernel          [runs]  Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
> 2.6.0-test4          1  75      100.0   0.0     0.0     0.94
> 2.6.0-test4-mm2      1  75      98.7    0.0     0.0     0.95
> 2.6.0-test4-mm4      1  77      97.4    0.0     0.0     0.96
> process_load:
> Kernel          [runs]  Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
> 2.6.0-test4          2  108     69.4    64.0    28.7    1.35
> 2.6.0-test4-mm2      2  125     59.2    92.5    38.4    1.58
> 2.6.0-test4-mm4      2  131     56.5    104.5   41.2    1.64
> io_load:
> Kernel          [runs]  Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
> 2.6.0-test4          4  119     64.7    43.4    19.2    1.49
> 2.6.0-test4-mm2      4  110     70.0    35.4    16.4    1.39
> 2.6.0-test4-mm4      4  129     59.7    43.1    16.9    1.61

Improvements:
> ctar_load:
> Kernel          [runs]  Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
> 2.6.0-test4          3  117     67.5    1.0     5.1     1.46
> 2.6.0-test4-mm2      3  115     69.6    1.0     6.1     1.46
> 2.6.0-test4-mm4      3  99      80.8    0.0     0.0     1.24
> xtar_load:
> Kernel          [runs]  Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
> 2.6.0-test4          3  132     58.3    3.0     7.5     1.65
> 2.6.0-test4-mm2      3  141     54.6    3.3     7.0     1.78
> 2.6.0-test4-mm4      3  109     70.6    1.0     3.7     1.36
> io_other:
> Kernel          [runs]  Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
> 2.6.0-test4          2  116     67.2    48.0    21.4    1.45
> 2.6.0-test4-mm2      2  110     70.0    41.0    18.8    1.39
> 2.6.0-test4-mm4      2  111     69.4    40.8    18.8    1.39
> read_load:
> Kernel          [runs]  Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
> 2.6.0-test4          2  109     72.5    8.6     5.5     1.36
> 2.6.0-test4-mm2      2  106     73.6    8.3     5.6     1.34
> 2.6.0-test4-mm4      2  100     78.0    6.5     5.0     1.25
> list_load:
> Kernel          [runs]  Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
> 2.6.0-test4          2  97      79.4    0.0     8.2     1.21
> 2.6.0-test4-mm2      2  96      80.2    0.0     7.3     1.22
> 2.6.0-test4-mm4      2  95      80.0    0.0     7.4     1.19
> mem_load:
> Kernel          [runs]  Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
> 2.6.0-test4          2  101     78.2    67.0    3.0     1.26
> 2.6.0-test4-mm2      2  98      79.6    66.5    3.1     1.24
> 2.6.0-test4-mm4      2  93      84.9    65.0    3.2     1.16
> dbench_load:
> Kernel          [runs]  Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
> 2.6.0-test4          4  390     19.5    6.2     57.3    4.88
> 2.6.0-test4-mm2      3  242     31.8    3.0     44.2    3.06
> 2.6.0-test4-mm4      4  260     29.6    3.2     45.0    3.25

Except that mm2 is doing better with dbench...

What changed there?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/