send_sig_info() in __switch_to() Ok or not?

From: Mikael Pettersson
Date: Sun Aug 24 2003 - 15:42:14 EST


I have a kernel extension (the x86 perfctr driver) that needs,
in a specific but unlikely case(*), to send a SIGILL to current
(next) in __switch_to(). Is this permitted or not?

I suspect it might not be because send_sig_info() eventually does
wake_up_process_kick(), and there's this warning in __switch_to()
not to call printk() since it calls wake_up()...

If I can't call send_sig_info() in __switch_to(), is there
another way to post a SIGILL to current from __switch_to()?

/Mikael

(*) A process on a HT P4 is using perfctrs and has an appropriate
cpus_allowed mask. Some other process changes our cpus_allowed,
and the scheduler migrates us to a non-0 thread. I detect this
in __switch_to()'s resume path and kill the counters, but I also
need to notify current somehow.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/