Re: Will uclibc be supported in 2.6? (was Re: [PATCH] Re: [PATCH]scsi.h uses "u8" which isn't defined.)

[Jeff Garzik]

Rob Landley wrote:
> I'm all for doing it in 2.7.  I just want to know what I should do for 2.6.  
> If there's a consensus that we're talking about 2.7 and allowing ad-hockery 
> to continue in 2.6, I'll shut up. :)


That's always been the consensus :)

2.6 is long past the point for major header surgery and breakage.

	Jeff



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/