Re: [PATCH] RFC: kills consistent_dma_mask

[Krzysztof Halasa]

"David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> > No. The documentation states that consistent_dma_mask (and not dma_mask)
> > will be used when doing pci_alloc_consistent().
> 
> Then the platforms need to implement the code.

There is no problem with that, i.e. the changes are trivial (except
for pci_map_*, but that's another story).

I don't know if it wouldn't break something, though. x86-64 and ia64
are much less tested than i386 and the change would alter i386
behaviour to that of x86-64/ia64.

Again: which driver uses the consistent_dma_mask and where I can find it?
-- 
Krzysztof Halasa
Network Administrator
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/