Re: [RFC][PATCH] Make cryptoapi non-optional?

[Matt Mackall]

On Sat, Aug 16, 2003 at 01:40:56PM -0700, Adam J. Richter wrote:
> At 2003-08-16 15:51:10, Matt Mackall wrote:
> >The
> >current code uses the stack (though currently rather a lot of it),
> >which lets it be fully re-entrant. Not an option with cryptoapi.
> 
> 	I posted a patch a while ago on one of the linux crypto
> mailing lists that defined these routines to support allocating
> crypto_tfm's on the stack:
> 
> int crypto_tfm_alloc_size(struct crypto_alg *alg, u32 tfm_flags);
> int crypto_tfm_init(struct crypto_tfm *tfm, struct crypto_alg *alg,
>                     u32 tfm_flags);
> 
> 	The patch also created crypto_alg_{get,put} routines so that
> crypto_tfm's could be created quickly without having to look up and
> release references to crypto_alg's.

Indeed. I suggested pretty much the same thing earlier in this thread
and got shot down by davem.

-- 
Matt Mackall : http://www.selenic.com : of or relating to the moon
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/