Re: generic strncpy - off-by-one error

[Timothy Miller]

Peter Kjellerstedt wrote:

> Timothy's       3.125003    6.128571    9.147905   33.325337  


Which of mine did you test?  The one with the single-byte fill, or the 
one with the multiple fill loops that does words for the bulk of the fills?

With some minor tweaks to eliminate compiler stupidity which compares 
against -1, that might win on the fill phase.  No?


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/