Re: [PATCH] lirc for 2.5/2.6 kernels - 20030802

From: Dennis Björklund
Date: Thu Aug 14 2003 - 10:28:01 EST


On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Gerd Knorr wrote:

> This is no reason for keeping lircd as event dispatcher, the input layer
> would do equally well (with liblirc_client picking up events from
> /dev/input/event<x> instead of lircd).

Would this allow you to have one reciever and different remote controles
(used for different programs in the end)?

You don't want both remotes map button 1 to the same BTN_1 or whatever
symbol is used.

--
/Dennis

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/