On Tuesday 05 August 2003 18:49, Timothy Miller wrote:
Or closer to the point:
"For each record player, there is a record which it cannot play."
For more detail, please read this dialog:
http://www.geocities.com/g0del_escher_bach/dialogue4.html
...
The interactivity detection algorithm will always be inherently
imperfect. Given that it is not psychic, it cannot tell in advance
whether or not a given process is supposed to be interactive, so it must
GUESS based on its behavior.
Another way of looking at it is that every time you remove a bottleneck, the next most serious problem becomes the new bottleneck.
Does this mean it's a bad idea to stop trying to identify the next bottleneck? (Whether or not you then choose to deal with it is another question...)