Re: [patch] SCHED_SOFTRR starve-free linux scheduling policy ...

[Mike Galbraith]

At 09:28 PM 8/10/2003 +0100, Daniel Phillips wrote:

> there's a cap on that.  And anyway, why aren't those kernel threads running
> with realtime priority in the first place?

Good question.  events, kblockd and aio at least look like they should.

> While we're in here: what should be the maximum realtime priority granted 
> to a
> normal user?  It should probably be another adminstrator knob.

That's an easy one.. the top of the SCHED_SOFTRR range ;)

        -Mike 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/