Re: [patch] SCHED_SOFTRR starve-free linux scheduling policy ...

[jw schultz]

On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 10:18:43AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> At 05:56 PM 8/10/2003 +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> 
> 
> >Mike Galbraith wrote:
> >
> >>At 03:43 PM 8/10/2003 +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Roger Larsson wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>*       SCHED_FIFO requests from non root should also be treated as 
> >>>>SCHED_SOFTRR
> >>>
> >>>I hope computers don't one day become so fast that SCHED_SOFTRR is
> >>>required for skipless mp3 decoding, but if they do, then I think
> >>>SCHED_SOFTRR should drop its weird polymorphing semantics ;)
> >>
> >>
> >>:)  My box is slow enough to handle them just fine, as long as I make 
> >>sure that oinkers don't share the same queue with the light weight player.
> >
> >
> >Just my (unsuccessful) attempt at humor!
> 
> (was successful here... made for wide grin:)

Here too.

You know, that SCHED_SOFTRR is almost sounding like it
should be a SCHED_RESERVED where you could specify a
quantity of CPU time reserved for each task in
SCHED_RESERVED individually rather like isochronous which
was brought up earlier by Con.  Of course you'd have to make
sure some time was unreservable.

-- 
________________________________________________________________
	J.W. Schultz            Pegasystems Technologies
	email address:		jw@xxxxxxxxxx

		Remember Cernan and Schmitt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/