Re: [PATCH]O14int

[Felipe Alfaro Solana]

On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 17:49, Con Kolivas wrote:
> More duck tape interactivity tweaks
> 
> Changes
> 
> Put some bounds on the interactive_credit and specified a size beyond which a 
> task is considered highly interactive or not.
> 
> Moved the uninterruptible sleep limiting to within recalc_task_prio removing 
> one call of the sched_clock() and being more careful about the limits.
> 
> Wli pointed out an error in the nanosecond to jiffy conversion which may have 
> been causing too easy to migrate tasks on smp (? performance change).
> 
> Put greater limitation on the requeuing code; now it only requeues interactive 
> tasks thereby letting cpu hogs run their full timeslice unabated which should 
> improve cpu intensive task performance.
> 
> Made highly interactive tasks earn all their waiting time on the runqueue
> during requeuing as sleep_avg.

I have been testing this jewel on top of 2.6.0-test2-mm5 for a couple of
hours. It behaves much like O13*int, well maybe a little bit better:
Renicing X to -20 is a total disaster (sluggish window movement, Juk
skipping like mad, etc), but with X at +0 the system feels pretty good.

Evolution still feels like a mamooth when moving windows over it. XMMS
doesn't skip, neither Juk does when X is at +0. This is good :-)
All in all, this one feels good!

PS: May I say O10int is still a little bit smoother than this one? ;-)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/