Re: RAW or BLK in 2.4.21

From: Jens Axboe (axboe@suse.de)
Date: Fri Aug 01 2003 - 05:27:33 EST

Next message: Flameeyes: "Re: Kernel 2.6.0-test2-mm2 Still No Penguin Logo"
Previous message: Mikael Pettersson: "Re: [PATCH] protect migration/%d etc from sched_setaffinity"
In reply to: ooyama eiichi: "RAW or BLK in 2.4.21"
Next in thread: ooyama eiichi: "Re: RAW or BLK in 2.4.21"
Reply: ooyama eiichi: "Re: RAW or BLK in 2.4.21"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, Aug 01 2003, ooyama eiichi wrote:
> Hi.
> I am developping a block device kernel module in 2.4 series.
> And i want to make a distinction between raw I/O and block I/O,
> in the request function i wrote for my module.
> But i could not find the way.
>
> my_request_fn(request_queue_t *q, int rw, struct buffer_head * bh)
>
> Is it possible ?
> I would be happy if someone give me a hint about this.

No, it is not possible to tell the difference inside your request_fn.

-- Jens Axboe

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Flameeyes: "Re: Kernel 2.6.0-test2-mm2 Still No Penguin Logo"
Previous message: Mikael Pettersson: "Re: [PATCH] protect migration/%d etc from sched_setaffinity"
In reply to: ooyama eiichi: "RAW or BLK in 2.4.21"
Next in thread: ooyama eiichi: "Re: RAW or BLK in 2.4.21"
Reply: ooyama eiichi: "Re: RAW or BLK in 2.4.21"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 07 2003 - 22:00:16 EST